The Monthly Misogynist

Fat and/or Ugly chicks club

2005-12-09T13:41:00.000-05:00

What every city needs is an club that caters to the Fat and/or Ugly women. This makes perfect sense. Guys who strike out at the regular bar could drop in a pick up some pussy for the night. Alcohol would need to be cheap and plentiful of course. But everyone leaves happy (maybe not wake up happy, but oh well!). Some names could include: The Last Chance, The Pit Stop, Centers of Gravity, The Whaler's Club, Desperate Measures, Cow-Tippers, Fat Lips, Ugly Necessity, Ugh & Lee's, Virgin Territory, Ride the Wave... the list goes on and on.
Why would a man visit such a place?

The draw-backs are obvious, including:
- Fat/Ugly women tend to be stalkers. Not dangerous usually as their self-esteem is too low to let them do anything but cry themselves to sleep.
- Fat women stink because they can't bathe properly. (Imagine trying to peel back those layers to get at the sweat...) Ugly women stink because they don't care about their appearance or hygiene.
- Make sure you use a condom! Not only are they unclean, but they will try desperately to get knocked up so they can sink some hooks into you. NOTE: Don't let them suck you off with the condom on - they'll bite the tip off without you noticing.

But there are some good points as well.
- They're easy.
- Fat / Ugly women will do anything to please a man. If you ever wanted to experiment sexually, they're the perfect subjects. It's not as if you respect them...
- They'll do all the work even if you're too drunk (highly recommended) to move. They'll fuck the shit out of you, even if you're puking or passed out.

Kameron Hurley (Brutal Women) & Types of feminists.

2005-12-09T12:49:00.000-05:00

"Brutal Women is what happens when intelligent feminism, excellent writing, and ass-kicking amateur boxing comes together." - From "Brutal Women", a blog by Kameron Hurley.
Hey, I'm all for women exercising regularly - it makes them more able to pleasure a man in bed afterall. And this girl looks good. Smart and educated too. But Boxing? Come on! This has prompted me to wonder how many kinds of feminists are there?
At the risk of using a tired old line, I think it is safe to say that the common underlying factor in feminism is the distrust and general loathing of men, particularly masculine men. Claims that feminists are merely interested in equality are bullshit. Women are not equal to men, particularly in the physical realm. True enough there are those women as strong or stronger then men, but they are freaks. So given that feminists hate men, the question begs to be asked why? I think the reason the woman hates the man determines what kind of feminist she is.
Here is a partial list off the top of my head:

The Fat Ugly Dyke: The FUD desperately craves attention from men, but do to their unattractive appearance they have not received any. Like the dumb shit in high school who claims they don't want to go to the party they were not invited too, it is obvious what is really going on with their public denial of their obvious wants. What little attention the FUD has gotten from men tends to be negative (be it insults or being blatantly used for sex - the cock slapping across their face is usually a hallmark) and only reinforces their love-hate obsession. FUDs tend to make the most vocal feminists because they are trying to convince themselves of their beliefs. FUDs can be FAGs or BEGs as well.

The Beautiful Man-handled Woman: The BMW is a rare form of feminist. They are attractive in some way, be it a pretty face, a nice rack or a great looking shitter. Because of this they have been the target of unwanted male attention since they bought their first bra, and this has made them hostile in general towards men. They feel (correctly) that men have no interest in them as a person, but as an object. For some reason BMWs tend to end up friends with FUDs. Although they are opposites, they make natural allies. The BMW can use the FUD as a shield against men (Have you met my friend Bertha? She'd love to talk to you...). It's simple and effective. She can shore up her pitiful FUD friend, and if the guy doesn't play along she can dismiss him as an insensitive jerk. The FUD on the other hand gets the obvious benefit - the BMW reels the men in, and with some of the guys being to weak to call the duo on their bullshit they end up talking to the FUD, much to their horror.
BMWs can be FAGs (very common) or BEGs.

The Fucking Angry Girl: This category includes those women who compete with men physically, particularly in violent sports. The image that sums the FAG up perfectly is that of a woman hitting a punching bag as hard as she can, all the while imagining it is a man she is striking. It may any man in general, or specific men. I can easily envision some of my ex's punching or kicking a heavy bag exhaling my name through clenched teeth. Generally FAGs had something really nasty perpetrated on them by a man, and as a result their hatred burns all that much more stronger.

The Brilliant Educated Girl: This is a girl with one hell of a mind, and because of it she spends too much time thinking. Whether she feels she deserves more simply because she is smarter, or she was filled with feminist propaganda in an institution of higher learning, there is no greater threat to Man's sacrosanct position as master than the BEG. To make matters worse BEGs are usually FAGs. These girls are pissed, and imminently capable of furthering the feminist agenda. They often have a softer face in public in order to obfuscate their true nature. They may marry men, but only after they have busted their balls. The whole concept of proverbial castration is the creation of the BEG. Note that BEGs tend to be liberal with the occasional (fanatic) conservative. Conservatives are just too dumb to fall into this category. Kameron Hurley seems to fit into this category perfectly.

Tribute to Ann Coulter

2005-12-09T12:31:00.000-05:00

Ann Coulter is a stupid, ugly fascist bitch who demonstrates what happens to a little girl when she believes that the man molesting her actually loves her. I have almost nothing positive to say about her. I say almost... From all appearances she appears to be Anorexic or Bulimic, or both. That is a plus in my book. Not because I like bone-racks (I prefer healthy looking women) but because I approve of the mindset behind it all. She must be all fucked up trying to make herself look attractive to men and compete with other women. Although she fails miserably, I admire her for trying so hard. Kudos to you Ann!

Conservative Cunts vs Liberal Lesbians

2005-12-09T12:00:00.000-05:00

I'm not sure which is worse. On the one hand you have liberal feminists whose goal seems to be the pussification of the left wing. Can it be disputed that the "men" of the Democratic party seem to have had thier balls cut off and are being displayed on the mantle over the fireplace? (No Virginia, those are not chestnuts roasting over an open fire...) I mean, really, you may as well hand liberal women riding crops and tell the liberal men to bend over. And they better like getting the red-ass, or there will be hell to pay! Is it any wonder the Democrats lost the uber-macho south? The only balls the typical Democrat displays are the balls of their feet as they run hell-bent away from confrontation. Of course the liberal feminists are happy with the state of affairs, emasculated males are their favourite kind of man. It took them a long time to perfect the proverbial castration (so much more preferable to actual castration - makes the man fat afterall!)
Conservative women on the other hand hate themselves and other women for taking advantage of men. Being typical conservatives though they fuck up misogyny just like they do everything else. The war party that can't fight a war. The party of moral values who are drowning in corruption. It would be funny if it wasn't so pathetic. Fuck it - it's funny as hell! It's like watching "Log Cabin Republicans" or Republicans of a minority trashing thier demographic. They hope that if they suck up to the beast the beast might allow them to keep a little bit of their dignity, or share a little of the spoils. I have stated that women are generally smart - I have to exclude conservative women from that statement. Just look at your typical right-wing cunt. Note the vapid expression, the dull look to their eyes, the slack jaw. For these women "God" gave them two lips for three reasons - to ask what their husbands want, to suck their husbands cock, and finally to intake sustenance to support the pussy that the husband married her for. (Although I'm a liberal, I do like these conservative women!!!) Note that I said "typical". There are also the fanatic bitches (Ann Coulter being their poster girl) who are frothing at the mouth to return all women to the kitchen and bedroom. I may agree with them on principle, but to be blunt they are fucking annoying. They should practice what they preach and start kicking off those shoes and socks. Otherwise they may as well be liberal lesbians out to undermine the place of man. It's not a woman’s prerogative to tell other women their place, it's the man’s prerogative.

Violence against women

2005-12-09T11:34:00.000-05:00

I view violence against women as the same thing as grade school violence against nerds/geeks. The perpetrator is often lacking in intelligence and usually has low self-esteem. Whatever our social status may have been in grade school & high school, we are all familiar with the dynamic. The kid with too much brains makes smart-assed remarks, and whether the dull-witted target understands just how they were insulted, they do grasp that they have been insulted.
The idiots grow up and may or may not grow up. If they were dumb as kids, they'll probably be dumb as adults, and hence easy targets for sharp-tongued witticisms. However, the nerds and jocks (to use two convenient stereotypes) no longer move in the same social circles as adults (In other words once they escape the literal prison that is the education system they are no longer forced to associate with people they dislike or hate). The nerds have comfy jobs with good hours and spend plenty of time at the gym. The jocks are lugging around the spare tire they've earned from all the beer they've consumed. The point is that the nerds and jocks don't associate, and if they did cross paths the nerd would kick the jocks ass. So what is a dumb shit unhappy with his life supposed to do? In today’s world the stress is piling on, and some men become literal walking time-bombs. Throw into this mix the master manipulator - your typical woman. Nobody likes to be manipulated, insulted or taken advantage of. Dumb men in particular are very sensitive to this. Yet they hitch up with a woman, who has been honing her verbal knives and barbs since she learned to string words together into a coherent sentence. Be it emotional manipulation, lies, guilt-tripping or sarcasm, the typical women is well versed in emotional and verbal warfare. The poor dumb fucks they choose to milk for a living don't stand a chance on this playing field - so they resort to one where they are clearly dominant - the physical. It really is sad and pathetic - the man flails around trying to reason with the woman, only to dig his grave deeper and deeper. In the end, he hits her out of frustration. Some women seek that response as it gives them a super-weapon in any upcoming contests of will (a powerful guilt inducer). Other women misread the situation or are too dumb to realize when they have pushed too far. Am I saying it's the woman’s fault? Not entirely. Afterall, I'm a sensitive new-age man who believes in partnership. In other words it takes two. In the end, if a man is abusive, it's up to the woman to get away from it. But it is interesting to note how many women choose to stay. That leads me to revise my blanket statement about women: All women are whores, some are fucking dumb whores, and a few are masochistic whores who love to be put in their place by the man they love.

The marriage contract - license to whore

2005-12-03T14:04:00.000-05:00

It has long been admitted by both men and women that the single greatest trait that a woman looks for in a mate is the ability to provide the three S's: Security, Shelter & Sustenance. (No, sex is not one of them). This fact is undeniable and supported by modern, mainstream literature. You can read about it on dating sites, books on "romance", and gossip columns. Given that the following statement is true: "Women are attracted to men who can provide for them and their potential offspring..." it is not a large leap at all to reach the conclusion that women are indeed, to be blunt, whores.
Dictionary.com defines the word whore as a prostitute, and the same site defines a prostitute as "One who solicits and accepts payment for sex acts." Everyone knows this - it's part of the common vernacular. However the word whore is reserved for those "shady" or "seedy" women who make a job out of giving blowjobs in pay-by-the-hour hotel rooms. This is a lie that society comforts itself with, along the same lines as "The poor deserve to be poor..." Given the strict definition, all women are whores in my view. Men provide money, protection, etc, and women provide what all men really want - one, two or even three orifices that they can use for sexual pleasure.
Society has taken great pains to legitimize this type of prostitution with the "sacred" institution of marriage. Marriage is really just a contract that legitimizes prostitution. It has been argued that men created the bond of marriage in order to secure his own private breeding stock and therefore ensure the survival of his seed. I think that idea got planted in a mans head by a woman after they had mind-blowing sex (which is the best time for women to manipulate men - right after the big O). Let us be realistic here and admit that women created the institution for their own benefit. No doubt many will scoff at this idea - women certainly did not always get much from marriage historically. I disagree. They may have been treated like slaves at times, but they did get benefits (compared to unmarried women) in return not the least of which was status. (Here's a clue for you boys - women in social settings don't dress up to impress men - they dress up to impress other women. Pissing contests between females is the real motivation behind those "I'll be ready in just a minute" scenarios that always take an hour or more). Status is as crucial between women as it is between men. Even in the modern day world just look at a deeply religious family to see how much status is awarded to a women when she "snags her man".
Back to the contract however. The contract over the course of centuries has been renegotiated over and over again. Modern day marriage is literally a license to steal (for the woman obviously). It is pretty much accepted that if a rich man marries a woman, she is after his wealth, and unless he has an iron-clad pre-nuptial agreement, he's screwed, then dumped, then robbed. That is some expensive whoring!!! The rich man scenario is easy enough to imagine and accept, but really the same thing happens everyday with those less fortunate. The law enshrines the right for a woman to claim the fruits of a man's labour, all based upon the fact that he signed a contract that was written to put him at a disadvantage from the start. You don't have to look hard for examples as they are all around us. Who doesn't know a man who was taken to the cleaners by an ex-wife? The woman gets the kids (personally I wouldn't want them!), the house, half his pay, etc. To a greater or lesser extent the system was designed to rob from men and give to women. And why? Because at some point the man signed a contract that guaranteed him regular sex. (That in itself is a load of crap - once the typical woman has her contract signed she'll renege on that deal faster than you can say "I have a headache.")
Don't tell me that modern marriage is for a man's benefit. Thankfully men are catching on. Of course society will look every which way in order to explain the declining marriage rates, but the simplest explanation is that men have caught on to the racket and are getting away from it. As much as I dislike, (ok, loathe) women and distrust their motives, I will never underestimate their intelligence. They have shaped the law of the land and brokered bedroom deals that have shaped society for as long as society has been around. Some may say that it's only fair as they are half the population - that's fine. I on the other hand think it's only fair to tell women to fuck right off.
Anyways, that's it for my first post. I'll expound more on that later. Also to come: the value of a paper bag in sex, the local bar scene 'round here and the snotty women who inhabit it, and what the first women president will mean (when that time arrives). I will also discuss my views on violence against women.